Techno Pickle

FISA

2007-08-20T03:48:00.000-07:00

Help! My computer and internet access are slowed down considerably by new unannounced FISA spying practices. Is there anyway we can electronically resist this non-binding legal irritation? i have the right to electronic privacy.

open sourcers unite, please.

FBI spyware

2007-07-19T12:33:00.000-07:00

Frankly, this is spyware just like any other, and is a violation of my 4th amendment unless there is a warrant out to investigate my private info. The pincher is that it is from the FBI, and they have an *address*. And they're state, so they are controlled by laws such as the Constitution. Lawbreaking in government is a culture.

I want technological responses to this. We should see add-ons and updates to normal antispyware programs that will check for 'spooks', and bugs and other offensive programs. I didn ot tgink I'd see the day that there were unConstitutional programs installed on my computer.

Paralell Computing

2007-06-30T13:44:00.000-07:00

As I mentioned below, arranging computers in an MC Escher design, or 'parallel computing' is a fine way to improve computer performance. Thanks www.trendplex.com. and pf Uzi Vishkin of the University of Maryland.

This is now about parallel humanity, parallel spirituality functioning together to make the world a better place. Huge piles of money will not do the trick, we need to make huge piles of humans work together.

Wired 2.0... 12.0

2007-06-27T21:58:00.000-07:00

I want a pair of glasses that have Korean sheetscreens for eyes. Instead of bending light as a lens, though they may be shaped as such, they will detect the region and display the image on the lens in front of the eye. They will also detect the orientation of the eye by video or micro sonar and shift the image as necessary.

They can show weather, have facial scans, play movies, zoom in, zoom out, give advice or tips, be an IM screen or wireless network, depending on health and safety.

It can probably field in energy from a pad or powerpack located nearby, or within the house, and have battery capability in the frames or earspots for some motion. They'd also gain energy from polarizing lens effects. They would use very little energy to operate as it were.

Eye motion regimens and blinks detected by sonar can be a learned programming interface with the machine, as a mouse would be. They can also respond to voice commands and send 911 calls and make normal phone calls. They would have compass features and mapquesting. They might play music as well in an earpiece or speaker. They could be flashlights and have the greenware nightvision, as well as motion detectors and other optical identification systems. They might record visually perceived or recorded voice ID'd and source ID'd words and assemble them into 'experience volumes' and help analyze them for truth and cohesion.

They would ask questions. They'd help you pick out clothes and judge the reactions of others to your statements and appearance using the autismmonitor.

They could be contact lenses.

The visual receiving portion would be contact lenses. There would probably be other wireless interfaced portions, such as a pocket protector to be the camera and plotter. In the 2050's they'll call this 'old tech'.

It'd be fantastically easy to produce powered contact lenses. Maybe... they already exist...

DARPA has an invitation to pay me.

IBM and the Petaflop

2007-06-26T21:29:00.001-07:00

One trillion operations per second are produced by this/these machines. It has 4 850MhZ chips and ~294,912 processors and stands six feet tall.

What is the peak potential for the computer world? More processing performance could be achieved by forming a Beowulf cluster of two [or more] of these monsters together, with a certain level of system synergy until the synergy wore off. However, this should be in the order of dozens of trillions of operations per second, if not more.

While Blue Gene/P is already autosynergous, it does not parse its operations to potential other itselves. If a computer is an MC Escher [boundaries periodically defined] of processing power, it will have a new level of performance. What is *this* peak, the theoretical non-size limited performance threshhold? Playing to this piper will produce greater performance enhancement than playing to the single-unit performance system.

Can we produce a giant terramonster from participating computers on the internet to rival our best supercomputers? Ala Folding@Home?

Virtual Genesis

2007-06-14T20:31:00.000-07:00

It seems that we have the ability to produce a virtual environment in which we can engineer a virtual human being, complete with virtual physiology.

We have mapped the human genome and physics sufficiently to simulate a human in a virtual environment complete down to microbiology. This will allow us to extend our understanding of the workings of genesis and biological life. The things that keep this virtual human from 'living' functionally in the simulation will give relief on the acuity with which we have mapped biology.

This would be a perfect environment in which to pre=test genetically modified foods and other GM functions to the 100k level. In this environment we could dramatically advance time rates and see how the genesis would advance over a period of several hundred/thousand years, assuming or dynamically modifying certain stabilities utilizing on a series quantum uncertainty randomizers.

I would like to measure the affect of electromagnetic fields in virtual environments. It seems that there are no casual attractors nor organized electromagnetic functions in any virtual environment experienced.

To do this sufficiently we will someday map a virtual world down to the atom and subatomic particles, up through biology, and to the macroworld. This is a level of resolution our traditional computers might not be able to complete in realtime for a normal vista. Qubit technologies should catch up and provide support by the time the software and physics have been relieved.

Do we now exist in such a virtual environment, mapped by our own quantum brains/wet computers, ourselves being alien engineered nanorobotic cells EM/collapsed into a biological matrix and social network?

What is the nonbiological spiritual dynamic portion of the spectrum? Is this earth a virtual world visible and present overlapping an infinitely unbound spiritual realm of uncertainty? Infinitely unbound. I like that. Distance and time are unimportant there, as the EM-0-angels fly, although the dynamics of this biological/physical dust condensations remain agreed upon by the mainframe/Hz data sotrage system called existance [see mp3].

It's just an illusion.

A particle is a wave stabilized into a loop. Agreed upon, decided 'yes', forgotten. Uncertainty mechanics and stabilization of wave. A wave itself forms from nothing. A particle coming from a field. [see BBTSJ field dynamics, the timeotron, the loveotron, the gravitron] The field effect of uncertainty, of existance remains.

This condition may be ruled by number theory, which potentially breaks the non 1=1 and enforces 12^ conditions in all things. All doubt and wrong is temporary and an illusion, righteousness is true and permanent and good. Those trapped in 1!=1 conditions or who don't "12^" [see number theory BBTSJ] should recognize and sympathize with this truth for they create their own lenses into an unsavory regional condition superimposed over normal truth.

[guest post for Billy Bunkie the Science Junkie]

Display

2007-06-14T20:04:00.000-07:00

I want to see holographic representation of games. Let's have a new piece of hardware available in 3D hologram, about 2' cube, which will project the image of the display into the box.

We should also promptly mock up some software drivers which will let conventional video cards and conventional 3d information be represented here in a fairly accurate 3D way. We could also see 3D representations from anywhere within the cube, assuming a point of focus at the user's head. We could infrared scan for the main user's head if they choose in a vdo interface option, or could limit the 3D effect to one side of the cube. Or make it a ball and call it 90*.

You'll want this.

Linux 2a

2007-06-09T20:57:00.000-07:00

An OS is necessary that learns yet knows what not to learn. Linux and microsoft are both unacceptable for their UI and networking dynamics. Networking needs dynamic changes.

An OS should learn like a human psyche to best serve its user, without competing with or superceding user activity at any time. An auto-digg system of user oriented self programming/programmability and favored code segments may be a positive step.

The OS could potentially use an autism monitor to detect the mood of the user. This would be a wonderful functional CPU-enhancing tehcnique. [c]

An OS that is not afraid to change itself, and to safely self-test new lines of code, and macro-segments of code, should be a better engineering method in a virtual environment than pure mankind originated factory coding, enhanced especially when user-monitored and actively modified and in a passive-autismodified environment.

It will do this effectively by knowing several core truths of code, Asimov style. Each new line of code from auto OS-mods and software and networking will be tested against superior truths down the line and assigned a level of seniority. Some truths are autosenior to all, by factory hard wiring, and the remainder follow in sequence from there. This is a superior system of .sys and possibly .ini files. In this way computers will program themselves to serve you better and dynamify coding. The computer itself will be playing a game, to try to fx your EM-signal or generate more positive inputs from the user.

I would encourage an OS that produced a new video game for me to play each week. Or sought after a system of face or aesthetic body recognition software as my art portfolio/desktop, or sought the best and most interesting to me science information. This is almost living. You do this.

Your computer is wet.

War is About Attention!?&^

2007-02-24T07:25:00.000-08:00

War is about attention. Firing a gun is a big attention getter. "Oh, they'll listen to this!!"

"This" is when discussion and argument have failed.

What do we ever argue over, except money, stuff, and sexual partners?

War is over money, seniority [mathematical order of operations], and sexual partners. And Zero else.

Scratch Quantum Program [does it scratch?]

2007-02-17T20:49:00.000-08:00

Scratch seems a good new programming language.

It is like moviemaking, which is a totally acceptable low-math application for computers. What do you want to make, anyway? An algorithm that swerves along to music? A story that moves with you? A musical theater with acoustic sets? A first person shooter? A third-person strat? All of these are plastic pieces laid over the chip, which is basically an uncertainty and certainty generator to effect change, to make the plastic dance in a special and funny way.

No one can figure out the original codework of the computer's transistor-level communication. Typing in binary would be 99% fruitless. So we need a different kind of programming language and browsing level. Browsing is almost the same as a programming language in relation to binary.

Binary is the level on which we move to the quantum. The qubit is 'probability'. Who cares about whole 1 or 0 answers. I want quick and shapely probabilities of what the answer might be. Which could come out as a stream of weighted 1's and 0's, or a fraction between 1 and 0 with a weight to it, or a systemed number theory application with the probability reading as its engine. Then with these numbers approached, the question posed is answered to some level of probability and certainty. It's like rolling dice very very quickly, and the software is the meaty RPG story around those dice, or the math lesson around the uncertainty if you're in an application, or just store your own english/01 data.

What is a browser doing, but getting results from an electric box according to the specific and timely will of the user? What is a code language, such as C, doing, except getting results from an electric chip according to the specific and timely will of the user, and passing the information on in a translated way?

Try making a browser that fits right onto binary, or a quantum uncertainty.

Try making a writable programming language that is far easier and less architectural than the number-based languages. A language must be a visual programming. I want a list of all the possible doohickeys I can do in the browser to the programmer, which will be draggable. I want them to be attachable via strings, have a viable start generator, and work through the potentials like a circuit would, or a belt on an engine.

Clearly, there will need to be [bee, iff, -bees] wormholes so the visual process will be easy. You can start a wormhole anywhere, and it blows open a window where the circuit goes, which could be a miniapplication or a conditional verifier. Give me this, google. You CIA summer loving hippies.

Polynary

2006-11-28T12:34:00.000-08:00

http://www.digg.com/tech_news/Scam_of_Indian_student_developing...
http://digg.com/gadgets/256GB_of_data_on_a_sheet_of_paper

This guy used geometric shapes to record data.

Let's stack a pile of many-sided paper shapes on top of one another. Let's also be able to spin them into any even more complex metashape comprised of all the shapes, and also certain 'stop codon' signals on any page that will divide the pile into two organizations instead of one.

A few sheets of paper together could form a very complex shape. If each piece of paper were the size of a quarter and having of roughly 80-100 sides, stacked perhaps in a group of 10, how many 3D combinations could you have? Also, how many somewhat jagged 2D metashapes could you form, with a sensitivity of "only 1*"? Depending on the acuity of the machine, tiny fractions of one degree of shape rotation could house important data. This rotation would be a recording.

The shapes may have color wheels on them instead of shapes, and their color Hz could be an excellent storage method.

Useful Lincks for Computrons

2006-10-15T16:08:00.000-07:00

Here's the web-based portable app. If you're using IE, keep your voice down and go to mozilla right away.

http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ -mozilla's flash blocker item.
while you're at it, www.mozilla.com.
http://fasterfox.mozdev.org/ -could be worthwhile

www.lavasoft.com -ad aware se personal
www.majorgeeks.com -for all your tweekin' needs
SPYBOT SEARCH & DESTROY

http://www.pctools.com/spyware-doctor/
-for this site, download the program and install because it is a godo shield and sniffer. but to actually eliminate any viruses, it costs like $20. So forget registering. I have ofund that 99% of the viruses it finds can be eliminated in the Registry by Run: regedit and following the path, and the other 1% are cut by the other spyware eliminators. Along with spyware blaster, these programs combined with a Microsoft AntiVirus or Norton AntiVirus should do the whole trick. Norton epidemically gets hacked by some virus that debilitates 10% of it's capability, but leaves it primarily intact. That is annoying, and I haven't seen a fix yet, but it still seems to hold.

That and stay out of bad neighborhoods after dark.

Oh, and there's GAIM. That's a fine chatterbox. You can also encrypt your stuff if you try hard enough.

You might also want to use Cablenut or Speedcorp's broadband tweaks. Speedcorp is a good time, but their site is MIA as of post. Try Cablenut. And has anyone heard about the free antivirus software Antivir?

TinyXP and Firefox Extensions

2006-09-29T17:24:00.000-07:00

You may enjoy running your CPU on TinyXP, which is a version of Windows XP that runs using only '40MB' of RAM and takes something like 400MB of disk space. This allows your computer to run blazingly quickly and does not snack up your hard drive space. Does everything a normal user would use Windows for during the life of the program. Requires serial #.

You could also enjoy using mozilla browser with certain extensions. Some can erase your footprints, some will stop flash animations unless you click on them [ads], block popups, view HTML, etc. If you're interested in viewing the HTML of a site you probably don't need my old help, tho.

Portable Braille and Screen Readers

2006-08-25T11:06:00.000-07:00

I want to find a piece of free software that will voice the text on any page highlighted. I also want a device like a mouse that will interact with a blind person by raising dots on a pad in the form of braille. It could be an output device for a blind person instead of a screen. The device could also be clickable, perhaps on certain braille bunches. They could click on option word 1, 2, or 3, and feel information from a different area. This could be palm and 3 fingers, in variable size.

I would accomplish this with a matrix of small raisable plates in the device. It would probably have a resolution of 200X300 dots, some moving in bunches for size control, with their height controllable as well to form rounded bubbles. The top 50X300 would be 3 clickable segments, with that data input into the computer. This could be an endless interactive story with a blind person, which seems like an attractive option. The device could even be rollable like a mouse to add more interactivity, perhaps as analog level data.

It'd be plug & play, require no visual input into the computer, and begin with Hello! It might also make certain beeps. It could contain a RAM stick for the basic commands. I imagine all data could fit on a 256 mb flash card, and a 1gb stick would last for the life of a human.

Make it be!

Microsoft Interruption

2006-08-21T19:51:00.000-07:00

Microsoft has some speed issues. Their software is unable to run on the average machine these days. I have listed numerous methods to quicken browsing and hardware reflection in software. Vista requires something like 700mb of RAM just to run. XP required only perhaps ~150MB on a good day.

Open the BIOS at startup and set your ram to run at 2T instead of 3T. This reduces a possible RAM bottleneck by 33% immediately.

Install WINUSCON from www.majorgeeks.com and examine your startup programs and services. Disable any services that you do not want. YPager is a common application that will never announce itself but runs at startup and doesn't do anything except use up 15-25MB of RAM, sometimes more, and slow down your startup.

You might also want to go to www.driverheaven.com and download TuneXP 1.5, if you run Windows XP. It can help you do numerous positive tasks for your system that you'd need to spend hours researching to understand that they even exist.

You could also go into System in the control panel and set your processor or RAM to run more intensively through programs or background processes, depending on how much resources you have and how much multitasking you do. You can also adjust your virtual memory to the highest allowable setting, usually in the GB range. This requires those GB of HD space.

Always download the latest drivers, do not use custom drivers. Do not try overclocking a laptop. Do not bother overclocking a system with few resources. RAM upgrades often do the trick for an old computer. Video card upgrades substantially extend the gaming life of a machine. Mozilla has an "about:config" directory, if you type it into the address line.

Note that good has authority over evil, and all good is together.

Blimps For Signal

2006-08-21T19:44:00.000-07:00

This is a great idea for wifi. It'd be cheaper than satellites.

Airships for signal.

I'd also like to send you info about The Midairport, a blimp-based high-altitude airport/spaceport.

Mozilla Trackless Entry

2006-08-21T19:27:00.000-07:00

You can surf freely through your mozilla.org browser by using the Trackmenot item found at the title link. Your actual searches will be obfuscated by a sea of low priority random searches. This is useful, it seems.

However, its usefulness depends both on the complexity of the random search and the speficity of your search. Yes, speficity is now a word. It means specificity, but no one wants to say nor spell that word and speficity is much better.

For example, if you search for JFK assassination, and the bot searches for all things A-Z of a string type between one and 16 characters in length, it will not shield you well. Also, the technology of the 'delayed cycle' code encrypted into new hard spyware, found in some keyboards, probably all new computers after 2006, etc, will transmit your info out into the world via imperceptible delays in signal processing. It is unencryptable.

Trackmenot would not prevent that, but I don't see how it could hurt you, unless it is a kind of software version of this hardware jig, which I highly doubt. It may also clog google and other isps.

http://missingpixel.net/v4/index.php

Email!!

www.timetravelisforsuckers.blogspot.com This is decent software, but can you do something along these lines about sending out faux pauses in code? I bet a jig for faux pauses would really mess that surveillance style up. Random faux pauses in a code of faux pauses will destroy that code. See if you can find the hardware items and then crack into them using software interrupts. Even the keylogging keyboard! It goes thru the cpu, it is hackable. 4th amendment rock.