Linux 2a
An OS is necessary that learns yet knows what not to learn. Linux and microsoft are both unacceptable for their UI and networking dynamics. Networking needs dynamic changes.
An OS should learn like a human psyche to best serve its user, without competing with or superceding user activity at any time. An auto-digg system of user oriented self programming/programmability and favored code segments may be a positive step.
The OS could potentially use an autism monitor to detect the mood of the user. This would be a wonderful functional CPU-enhancing tehcnique. [c]
An OS that is not afraid to change itself, and to safely self-test new lines of code, and macro-segments of code, should be a better engineering method in a virtual environment than pure mankind originated factory coding, enhanced especially when user-monitored and actively modified and in a passive-autismodified environment.
It will do this effectively by knowing several core truths of code, Asimov style. Each new line of code from auto OS-mods and software and networking will be tested against superior truths down the line and assigned a level of seniority. Some truths are autosenior to all, by factory hard wiring, and the remainder follow in sequence from there. This is a superior system of .sys and possibly .ini files. In this way computers will program themselves to serve you better and dynamify coding. The computer itself will be playing a game, to try to fx your EM-signal or generate more positive inputs from the user.
I would encourage an OS that produced a new video game for me to play each week. Or sought after a system of face or aesthetic body recognition software as my art portfolio/desktop, or sought the best and most interesting to me science information. This is almost living. You do this.
Your computer is wet.
An OS should learn like a human psyche to best serve its user, without competing with or superceding user activity at any time. An auto-digg system of user oriented self programming/programmability and favored code segments may be a positive step.
The OS could potentially use an autism monitor to detect the mood of the user. This would be a wonderful functional CPU-enhancing tehcnique. [c]
An OS that is not afraid to change itself, and to safely self-test new lines of code, and macro-segments of code, should be a better engineering method in a virtual environment than pure mankind originated factory coding, enhanced especially when user-monitored and actively modified and in a passive-autismodified environment.
It will do this effectively by knowing several core truths of code, Asimov style. Each new line of code from auto OS-mods and software and networking will be tested against superior truths down the line and assigned a level of seniority. Some truths are autosenior to all, by factory hard wiring, and the remainder follow in sequence from there. This is a superior system of .sys and possibly .ini files. In this way computers will program themselves to serve you better and dynamify coding. The computer itself will be playing a game, to try to fx your EM-signal or generate more positive inputs from the user.
I would encourage an OS that produced a new video game for me to play each week. Or sought after a system of face or aesthetic body recognition software as my art portfolio/desktop, or sought the best and most interesting to me science information. This is almost living. You do this.
Your computer is wet.
posted by William Bunker at 8:57 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home